TO LIVE BETTER
mid-2010, Francisco Rojas published a series of approaches towards economic and social indicators as well as in areas of governance, corruption and public insecurity of President Felipe Calderón, whose title asks the question To live better? , as is well known, is the motto of six years.
Based on official statistics and international studies, and after exposure objective facts and figures, the author asks: Is the persistent fall of the economy is a form of live better?, "Rising unemployment and its variants contribute to better living ?, Is the dismantling of industry, declining foreign investment, declining competitiveness and incentives for businesses allows us to live better?, "The lack of production credits is a way to live better?," contributing to food dependency live better? Interrogate
then: Is the waste oil and the divestment of the electricity industry tools to live better ?, Is the mismanagement of public finances, failure programs, expenditures not approved and the lack of a comprehensive and appropriate evaluation results contribute to better living ?
With the deterioration in the last 9 years in welfare indicators can you say that people are able to live better ?, Is the loss of governance, the collapse of the rule of law and the explosive growth corruption is a guarantee for better living ?, is the increased insecurity, fears of instability and mistrust in institutions are better ways to live ?
concludes in the three paragraphs that follow:
"Indicators presented here realize that the phrase "to live better" has no basis in reality. Management from the PAN governments has been inadequate and has not resolved problems in highly sensitive areas like the economy, employment, public safety, education, health.
"No one can welcome these results, even the critics who see fulfilled their fears, because the consequences of mistakes are devastating in a country with half its population in poverty or on the edge of it, with a non-school youth no job or future.
"There is concern about the consequences of ineffective leadership of the country and are committed to do everything in our power to mitigate the woes of today and contribute to the proposal of a national project that works and rescue the sense of public solidarity based on equality and social cohesion. "
seems that with the above is making a sketch of the absurd reality that they have inherited Baja California Sur government issued two presidential administrations of the PRD.
The other question is whether the same will bring the next four years as a result of the project is still unimaginable for a government from two irreconcilable political currents.
em_coronado@yahoo.com
mid-2010, Francisco Rojas published a series of approaches towards economic and social indicators as well as in areas of governance, corruption and public insecurity of President Felipe Calderón, whose title asks the question To live better? , as is well known, is the motto of six years.
Based on official statistics and international studies, and after exposure objective facts and figures, the author asks: Is the persistent fall of the economy is a form of live better?, "Rising unemployment and its variants contribute to better living ?, Is the dismantling of industry, declining foreign investment, declining competitiveness and incentives for businesses allows us to live better?, "The lack of production credits is a way to live better?," contributing to food dependency live better? Interrogate
then: Is the waste oil and the divestment of the electricity industry tools to live better ?, Is the mismanagement of public finances, failure programs, expenditures not approved and the lack of a comprehensive and appropriate evaluation results contribute to better living ?
With the deterioration in the last 9 years in welfare indicators can you say that people are able to live better ?, Is the loss of governance, the collapse of the rule of law and the explosive growth corruption is a guarantee for better living ?, is the increased insecurity, fears of instability and mistrust in institutions are better ways to live ?
concludes in the three paragraphs that follow:
"Indicators presented here realize that the phrase "to live better" has no basis in reality. Management from the PAN governments has been inadequate and has not resolved problems in highly sensitive areas like the economy, employment, public safety, education, health.
"No one can welcome these results, even the critics who see fulfilled their fears, because the consequences of mistakes are devastating in a country with half its population in poverty or on the edge of it, with a non-school youth no job or future.
"There is concern about the consequences of ineffective leadership of the country and are committed to do everything in our power to mitigate the woes of today and contribute to the proposal of a national project that works and rescue the sense of public solidarity based on equality and social cohesion. "
seems that with the above is making a sketch of the absurd reality that they have inherited Baja California Sur government issued two presidential administrations of the PRD.
The other question is whether the same will bring the next four years as a result of the project is still unimaginable for a government from two irreconcilable political currents.
em_coronado@yahoo.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment